<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battlestar Galactica: Above the Genre?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/index.php/2009/03/29/battlestar-galactica-above-the-genre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/2009/03/29/battlestar-galactica-above-the-genre/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/2009/03/29/battlestar-galactica-above-the-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/?p=601#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Some very nice points here, sir.  Well put!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very nice points here, sir.  Well put!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elton</title>
		<link>http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/2009/03/29/battlestar-galactica-above-the-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Elton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/?p=601#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Moving them out of the corner would be a great start. I&#039;m just not sure if they really believe it&#039;s inferior or if it&#039;s just that they all want to look as smart as the rest of the critics.
 I had hoped that perhaps Harry Potter would get people to look differently at speculative fiction but it seems like it hasn&#039;t but then they ignore Steven King and Michael Crichton too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving them out of the corner would be a great start. I&#8217;m just not sure if they really believe it&#8217;s inferior or if it&#8217;s just that they all want to look as smart as the rest of the critics.<br />
 I had hoped that perhaps Harry Potter would get people to look differently at speculative fiction but it seems like it hasn&#8217;t but then they ignore Steven King and Michael Crichton too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writing fiction</title>
		<link>http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/2009/03/29/battlestar-galactica-above-the-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>writing fiction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threetreesstudios.com/andscifi/?p=601#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I agree. The best way (I think) to change this association is to get an organization of bookstore owners together and decide to shelve the sci-fi out front with mainstream books, instead of putting them in a corner somewhere. That could make the market change, because they are following buying habits. If sci-fi spiked in sales, critics would jump on the opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The best way (I think) to change this association is to get an organization of bookstore owners together and decide to shelve the sci-fi out front with mainstream books, instead of putting them in a corner somewhere. That could make the market change, because they are following buying habits. If sci-fi spiked in sales, critics would jump on the opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
